Filed: Dec. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9, and Defendants, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC. and LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, by and th
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9, and Defendants, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC. and LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, by and thr..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
COMES NOW Plaintiff, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA THE BANK OF NEW YORK AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS II INC. BEAR STEARNS ALT-A TRUST 2005-9, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-9, and Defendants, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC. and LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On November 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment herein [ECF #59]. Responses to said Motion are presently due on December 6, 2018.
2. Defendants' counsel have been required to devote time and attention to numerous other pending legal matters since the filing of the Motion for Summary Judgment which have detracted from the time available prepare a response. In addition, the Thanksgiving Holiday and family obligations associated therewith impacted the time available.
3. Based upon the foregoing, Defendants have requested and shall be granted an extension of time until January 4, 2019, in which to respond to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.
4. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
