Casey v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00546-JAD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181214d94
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [PROPOSED ORDER] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from December 11, 2018 to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to scheduling conflicts for agency and U.S. Attorney review, Counsel ha
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [PROPOSED ORDER] GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from December 11, 2018 to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to scheduling conflicts for agency and U.S. Attorney review, Counsel has..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND [PROPOSED ORDER]
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from December 11, 2018 to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's fourth request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Due to scheduling conflicts for agency and U.S. Attorney review, Counsel has a Ninth Circuit brief due this week. In addition, Counsel has a Ninth Circuit oral argument next week, which requires significant preparation and moot courts. Counsel also had a migraine yesterday and was out of the office on sick leave. Good cause also exists as Counsel had an emergency matter arise in one of her other cases that she must immediately respond to on the date of the current filing deadline. As such, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
