Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Woodcrest Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-00309-GMN-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181217a77 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES [ECF No. 39 and ECF No. 40] (SECOND REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), and Airmotive Investments, LLC ( Airmotive ), hereby stipulate and agree that BANA shall have an extension of time up to and including December 21, 2018, to file its response to Airmotive's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 39] and Airmotive's motion to dismiss, or alternatively, motion for summary judgmen
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES [ECF No. 39 and ECF No. 40]

(SECOND REQUEST)

Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), and Airmotive Investments, LLC (Airmotive), hereby stipulate and agree that BANA shall have an extension of time up to and including December 21, 2018, to file its response to Airmotive's motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 39] and Airmotive's motion to dismiss, or alternatively, motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 40]. Both of Airmotive's motions were filed on November 20, 2018. BANA's response to Airmotive's motions, ECF No. 39 and 40, are currently due on December 14, 2018.

This is the parties' second request for an extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but to consolidate the deadline with the dispositive motion deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer