Patton v. Citizens Bank, N.A., 2:18-cv-1351-APG-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181218d17
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2018
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 24, 30] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Eighth Judicial District, Garcia-Mendoza, and Snavely. Docket No. 24; see also Docket No. 13. Also pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending its motion to dismiss, filed by Defendant Citizen Bank. Docket No. 30; see also Docket No. 19. Plaintiff did not file a response to either motio
Summary: Order [Docket Nos. 24, 30] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Eighth Judicial District, Garcia-Mendoza, and Snavely. Docket No. 24; see also Docket No. 13. Also pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending its motion to dismiss, filed by Defendant Citizen Bank. Docket No. 30; see also Docket No. 19. Plaintiff did not file a response to either motion..
More
Order
[Docket Nos. 24, 30]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Eighth Judicial District, Garcia-Mendoza, and Snavely. Docket No. 24; see also Docket No. 13. Also pending before the Court is a motion to stay discovery pending its motion to dismiss, filed by Defendant Citizen Bank. Docket No. 30; see also Docket No. 19. Plaintiff did not file a response to either motion to stay discovery. See Docket. Considering the standards applicable to a motion to stay discovery, see, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the Court finds sufficient cause to stay discovery in this case. Accordingly, the motions to stay discovery, Docket Nos. 24 and 30, are GRANTED.
Discovery is hereby STAYED pending resolution of the motions to dismiss at Docket Nos. 13, 19. To the extent resolution of those motions does not result in the termination of this case, a proposed discovery plan shall be filed within 14 days of the issuance of such order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
