Skinner v. Newmont Mining Corporation, 2:18-cv-01787-KJD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181219e20
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE DATE THAT PLAINTIFF MUST FILE HIS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR INTRADISTICT TRANSFER (First Request) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties' respective counsels of record pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2 that Plaintiff Kirk Skinner's ("Plaintiff") response to Defendant Newmont USA Limited, et al.'s ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE DATE THAT PLAINTIFF MUST FILE HIS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR INTRADISTICT TRANSFER (First Request) KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties' respective counsels of record pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2 that Plaintiff Kirk Skinner's ("Plaintiff") response to Defendant Newmont USA Limited, et al.'s ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE DATE THAT PLAINTIFF MUST FILE HIS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR INTRADISTICT TRANSFER
(First Request)
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties' respective counsels of record pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 6-2 that Plaintiff Kirk Skinner's ("Plaintiff") response to Defendant Newmont USA Limited, et al.'s ("Defendant") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint and motion for intradistrict transfer, both filed on October 24, 2018, for which the responses to both are currently due by November 7, 2018, will both be continued to November 16, 2018.
Said continuances are being stipulated to, to give Plaintiff an adequate opportunity to respond to said motions given other matters Plaintiff's counsel currently is involved in, including multiple responses to written discovery due this week. No previous continuances or extensions have been requested or granted as to the filing of Plaintiff's responses to Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint or Defendant's motion for intradistrict transfer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
