Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nickler v. Clark County, 2:18-cv-01668-JCM-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181221b78 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANTS CLARK COUNTY AND KATHLEEN LAMBERMONT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Danielle C. Miller, Esq. of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, counsel for Defendants CLARK COUNTY and KATHLEEN LAMBERMONT, and James P. Kemp, Esq. of KEMP & KEMP ATTORNEYS AT LAW, counsel for Plaintiff JACQUELYN NICKLER ("Plaintiff"), and pursuant to Local Rules 6-1
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF DEFENDANTS CLARK COUNTY AND KATHLEEN LAMBERMONT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Danielle C. Miller, Esq. of LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP, counsel for Defendants CLARK COUNTY and KATHLEEN LAMBERMONT, and James P. Kemp, Esq. of KEMP & KEMP ATTORNEYS AT LAW, counsel for Plaintiff JACQUELYN NICKLER ("Plaintiff"), and pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, that:

The due date for Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 24) to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 18), be extended from December 20, 2018 to December 28, 2018.

Reason for the Extension:

Counsel for Defendants will need additional time to research and address the issues raised in Plaintiff's Response. This is Defendants' and Plaintiff's first request to extend this deadline, which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer