Bank of America, N.A. v. Woodcrest Homeowners Association, 2:15-cv-01193-MMD-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181221h06
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY SUPPORTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 76 and 77] [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ) and defendants Woodcrest Homeowners Association and Airmotive Investments, LLC respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA fourteen additional days to reply its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 76. BANA filed its motion for partial summary judgment on November 12, 2018.
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY SUPPORTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 76 and 77] [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ) and defendants Woodcrest Homeowners Association and Airmotive Investments, LLC respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA fourteen additional days to reply its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 76. BANA filed its motion for partial summary judgment on November 12, 2018. (..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO REPLY SUPPORTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 76 and 77]
[FIRST REQUEST]
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and defendants Woodcrest Homeowners Association and Airmotive Investments, LLC respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA fourteen additional days to reply its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 76.
BANA filed its motion for partial summary judgment on November 12, 2018. (ECF No. 76.) Woodcrest and Airmotive both filed their oppositions on December 12, 2018. (ECF Nos. 84, 85.) BANA's reply is due December 26, 2018.
The parties stipulate to extending BANA's reply deadline fourteen days, to January 9, 2019, to allow additional time to prepare the briefing in light of the intervening holidays. This is the first request to extend reply briefing deadlines.
This stipulation is not made to case delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
