STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FIRST REQUEST

KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.

COMES NOW Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Ameriquest Mortgage Securities Inc., Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-R10 (hereinafter "Deutsche Bank"), Defendant, Northbrook Homeowners Association, Inc. (hereinafter "Northbrook HOA"), and Defendant/Counter-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (hereinafter "SFR") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, and hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. SFR filed their Response to Northbrook HOA's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF. No. 68] and Deutsche Bank filed their Opposition to Northbrook HOA's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 69], respectively, on December 19, 2018, and Replies thereto are due by January 2, 2019;

2. Deutsche Bank filed its Opposition to SFR's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 70] on December 21, 2018, and Replies thereto are due by January 4, 2019.

3. SFR filed its Opposition to Deutsche Bank's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 71] on December 21, 2018, and Replies thereto are due by January 4, 2019;

4. Northbrook HOA filed its Response in Opposition to Deutsche Bank's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 72] on December 21, 2018, and Replies thereto are due by January 4, 2019;

5. The Parties agree to extend the deadline for the Parties to file their respective Replies to SFR's Response to Northbrook HOA's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF. No. 68], Deutsche Bank's Opposition to Northbrook HOA's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 69] and Opposition to SFR's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 70], SFR's Opposition to Deutsche Bank's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 71], and Northbrook HOA's Response in Opposition to Deutsche Bank's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 72] to January 11, 2019.

6. This extension is requested due to the holiday schedule in which counsel for the Parties would be absent from work due to the closure of their respective offices in observance of the Christmas and New Year's Day holidays.

7. This is the parties' first request for extension of this deadline, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.