Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lake Las Vegas Master Trust v. United States Internal Revenue Service, 2:14-cv-00435-JAD-NJK (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190107662 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS ECF Nos. 117, 118 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiff, LN MANAGEMENT LLC SERIES 31 RUE MEDITERRA ( "LN" ) and Defendant UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ( "IRS" ), by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On December 13, 2018, IRS filed a Motion for Distribution of Funds herein [ECF #116]. LN's Response to said Motion was due on or before De
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS

ECF Nos. 117, 118

COMES NOW Plaintiff, LN MANAGEMENT LLC SERIES 31 RUE MEDITERRA ("LN") and Defendant UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ("IRS"), by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On December 13, 2018, IRS filed a Motion for Distribution of Funds herein [ECF #116]. LN's Response to said Motion was due on or before December 27, 2018. 2. LN's counsel has requested an extension of time in which to respond to the subject Motion primarily as a result of the intervening holidays and family obligations associated therewith. In addition, counsel has had a large number of other work obligations. Moreover the parties desire to explore whether an amicable resolution of the Motion may be possible. 3. Although the request for an extension was made prior to the deadline, the instant stipulation is being submitted after the deadline because counsel for the IRS has been affected by the ongoing partial government shut down. As a result, counsel was not able to immediately respond to the request. 4. LN shall have an extension of time to file its Response to the Motion for Distribution of Funds until January 18, 2019. 5. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer