Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allegiant Air, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, 2:18-cv-01360-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190108b54 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Allegiant Air, LLC ("Allegiant"), by and through its counsel of record, Jackson Lewis P.C. and Jones Day, and Defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, Airline Professionals Association Teamsters Local Union No. 1224, and Daniel Wells, by and through their counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm and Law Office of Ed
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM

Plaintiff Allegiant Air, LLC ("Allegiant"), by and through its counsel of record, Jackson Lewis P.C. and Jones Day, and Defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, Airline Professionals Association Teamsters Local Union No. 1224, and Daniel Wells, by and through their counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm and Law Office of Edward Gleason, PLLC, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' counterclaim to January 22, 2019.

Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Counterclaim Against Plaintiff was filed on December 18, 2018. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff response to the counterclaim is currently due on January 8, 2019. As noted in the parties' Joint Interim Status Report (ECF No. 40), Plaintiff intends to move to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim. A ruling in Plaintiff's favor on such a motion may reduce the time needed for trial. The recent Christmas and New Year's Day holidays have slowed preparation of Plaintiff's response as many employees were out of the office. As such, Plaintiff requires a two-week extension of time—until January 22, 2019—to prepare its response. Plaintiff has conferred with Defendants, and Defendants have stated that they do not oppose Plaintiff's request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer