Davis v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, 2:18-cv-02181-APG-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190110c85
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jan. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST] CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC ( Carrington ) and Plaintiff Cheryl Davis ( Plaintiff ) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Plaintiff Cheryl Davis file her complaint on November 13, 2018 [ECF No. 1]. Carrington's deadline to answer complaint was December 6, 2018. On December 7, 2018 the parties stipulated
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT [SECOND REQUEST] CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC ( Carrington ) and Plaintiff Cheryl Davis ( Plaintiff ) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: Plaintiff Cheryl Davis file her complaint on November 13, 2018 [ECF No. 1]. Carrington's deadline to answer complaint was December 6, 2018. On December 7, 2018 the parties stipulated ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT
[SECOND REQUEST]
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC (Carrington) and Plaintiff Cheryl Davis (Plaintiff) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
Plaintiff Cheryl Davis file her complaint on November 13, 2018 [ECF No. 1]. Carrington's deadline to answer complaint was December 6, 2018. On December 7, 2018 the parties stipulated to extend the deadline to answer complaint until January 7, 2019. The parties stipulate and agree that Carrington shall have an additional 4 days to file a response to Plaintiff's amended complaint. The new deadline for Carrington to answer the amended complaint is January 11, 2019.
This is the second request for an extension of this deadline, it is made in good faith, and is not made for purposes of undue delay. The request is made to allow Carrington to further review the allegations of the complaint and provide a meaningful response.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
