Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of New York Mellon v. Las Vegas Development Group LLC, 2:16-cv-00478-JCM-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190111e12 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: (1)PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 59]; (2) DEFENDANT ROYAL HIGHLANDS STREET AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [EFC NO. 61]; and (3) DEFENDANTS LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC and AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 62] (Second Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff the Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York as Successor in Inter
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: (1)PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 59]; (2) DEFENDANT ROYAL HIGHLANDS STREET AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [EFC NO. 61]; and (3) DEFENDANTS LAS VEGAS DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC and AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 62]

(Second Request)

Plaintiff the Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York as Successor in Interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank NA as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc. Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2005-9, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-9 ("BNYM" or "Plaintiff"), Defendant Royal Highlands Street and Landscape Maintenance Corporation ("Royal Highlands"), and Defendants Las Vegas Development Group, LLC and Airmotive Investments, LLC ("LVDG" and collectively with BNYM and LVDG, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the briefing schedule on the Parties' Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF Nos. 59, 61, and 62] as follows:

Plaintiff's response to Defendants Royal Highlands opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended from January 10, 2019 to January 17, 2019; and

Defendants Royal Highlands' and LVDGs' replies to Plaintiff's opposition to their Motions for Summary Judgment will be extended from January 10, 2019 to January 17, 2019.

The reason for the extension is not for purposes of delay but rather, is due to the workload of the Parties' attorneys upon returning to the office after the holidays. This is the Parties' second request for an extension of these deadlines.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer