Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ditech Financial LLC v. Cao Limin, 2:18-cv-01545-JCM-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190111e38 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF DITECH FINANCIAL LLC TO FILE A RESPONSE TO SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DITECH FINANCIAL'S COMPLAINT FOR QUIET TITLE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (SECOND REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC ("Ditech"), by and through its attorneys, Wolfe & Wyman LLP, to respond to SAFARI HO
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF DITECH FINANCIAL LLC TO FILE A RESPONSE TO SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DITECH FINANCIAL'S COMPLAINT FOR QUIET TITLE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

(SECOND REQUEST)

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Plaintiff, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC ("Ditech"), by and through its attorneys, Wolfe & Wyman LLP, to respond to SAFARI HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DITECH FINANCIAL'S COMPLAINT FOR QUIET TITLE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed on December 11, 2018 [ECF No. 15]. Ditech's response is due on January 11, 2019. The parties stipulate to extend Ditech's time to file its response from January 11, 2019 to January 18, 2019. This stipulation is to accommodate the schedules of counsel and discuss potential settlement. This is the second stipulation for extension to respond to papers filed regarding Safari Homeowners' Association's Motion to Dismiss. This request is not for any improper purpose or delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer