Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01899-RFB-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190115e86 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 79, 81] (SECOND REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSMC Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-7's ("U.S. Bank") and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby respectfull
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 79, 81]

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSMC Mortgage-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-7's ("U.S. Bank") and Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby respectfully request the Court enter an order, pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and LR 7-1, extending the briefing schedule for oppositions and replies to U.S. Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on November 26, 2018 [ECF No. 79], and (2) SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on November 27, 2018 [ECF No. 81] (the "Motions"). The current deadline to oppose the Motions is January 25, 2019 and the current 4826-5927-7445 deadline to reply in support of the Motions is February 15, 2019. This is the Parties' second extension request and is made prior to the current deadline to file oppositions.

Counsel for U.S. Bank, Robin E. Perkins and Jennifer L. McBee, will be in trial during the time period of the current briefing deadlines, and therefore, U.S. Bank wishes to extend the briefing schedule by two weeks. Counsel for SFR is agreeable to this extension request. The Parties further stipulate and agree that discovery remains closed.

Therefore, the Parties request the Court extend the deadline for oppositions to the Motions to February 8, 2019, and the deadline for replies in support of the Motions to March 1, 2019. This stipulated extension request is made for the benefit and convenience of the Parties, is sought in good faith, and is not made for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer