Reno v. Western Cab Company, 2:18-cv-00840-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190116d38
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' COUNTER-MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL LEAVE. [ECF No. 20] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The plaintiffs have filed a "counter-motion" for "conditional leave" to more fully address questions surrounding arbitration agreements that may be relevant to this case. ECF No. 20 at 12-14. Because of my decisions on the defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiffs' motion for confirmation of supplemental jurisdiction (ECF No. 67), the plaintiffs' counter-motion is moot.
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' COUNTER-MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL LEAVE. [ECF No. 20] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The plaintiffs have filed a "counter-motion" for "conditional leave" to more fully address questions surrounding arbitration agreements that may be relevant to this case. ECF No. 20 at 12-14. Because of my decisions on the defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiffs' motion for confirmation of supplemental jurisdiction (ECF No. 67), the plaintiffs' counter-motion is moot. T..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' COUNTER-MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL LEAVE.
[ECF No. 20]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have filed a "counter-motion" for "conditional leave" to more fully address questions surrounding arbitration agreements that may be relevant to this case. ECF No. 20 at 12-14. Because of my decisions on the defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiffs' motion for confirmation of supplemental jurisdiction (ECF No. 67), the plaintiffs' counter-motion is moot. To the extent that the arbitration agreements may influence future decisions in this case, the parties may raise those issues at the appropriate time. But this is not that time.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiffs Michael Reno and Eric Kiefaber's counter-motion for conditional leave (ECF No. 20) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.
Source: Leagle
