Filed: Jan. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 14, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER (Third Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm McLetchie Law and along with Defendants, Sean Bloomfield, Aaron Dicus, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through counsel, Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt, and Senior Deputy Attorney General Frank A. Toddre II, of the State of Nevada,
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER (Third Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm McLetchie Law and along with Defendants, Sean Bloomfield, Aaron Dicus, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through counsel, Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt, and Senior Deputy Attorney General Frank A. Toddre II, of the State of Nevada, O..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER (Third Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm McLetchie Law and along with Defendants, Sean Bloomfield, Aaron Dicus, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through counsel, Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt, and Senior Deputy Attorney General Frank A. Toddre II, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, hereby agree and stipulate to extend certain post-trial deadlines.
First, the deadline for Plaintiff to submit a proposed order with underlying documentation as to fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. (ECF No. 156) shall be extended from December 21, 2018 to January 22, 2019.
Second, Defendants have filed a Motion for Reconsideration under Rule 59. (ECF No. 145). Plaintiff's deadline to respond to that Motion shall be extended from January 17, 2019 to February 18, 2019.
Third, Defendants have filed a Limited Objection to the Bill of Costs filed by Plaintiff on September 20, 2018 (ECF No. 146). Plaintiff's reply, if any, to any Objection shall be extended from December 21, 2018 to January 22, 2019.
This Stipulation is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay, but in the interest of effectively representing both parties' interests in this matter. The parties are currently discussing settlement and wish to reduce the accumulation of attorney's fees.
Moreover, other deadlines have interfered with Plaintiff's preparation of the proposed order, response to the Motion for Reconsideration, and reply to the Objection to the Bill of Costs. Specifically, counsel for Plaintiff has an Answering Brief/Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal due on December 20, 2018 in City of Henderson v. Las Vegas Review-Journal, Nev. S. Ct. Case No. 75407. Additionally, counsel for Plaintiff will be out of the jurisdiction December 21, 2018 through December 29, 2018.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
