Ditech Financial LLC v. Stonefield II Homeowners Association, 3:16-cv-00227-MMD-WGC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190117b40
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiffs, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, and Defendant, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On November 20, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment herein [ECF #60]. A response was due on
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COMES NOW Plaintiffs, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, and Defendant, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. On November 20, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment herein [ECF #60]. A response was due on ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Second Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
COMES NOW Plaintiffs, DITECH FINANCIAL LLC f/k/a GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, and Defendant, AIRMOTIVE INVESTMENTS, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, and hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On November 20, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment herein [ECF #60]. A response was due on December 11, 2018.
2. On December 11, 2018, the Parties stipulated herein to extend the responsive deadline for 30 days [ECF #62].
3. This Court granted the Parties' stipulation, and ordered that any opposition to the Motion would be extended until January 11, 2019.
4. As a result of the holidays and family obligations associated therewith, Defendant's counsel has been required to devote time and attention to numerous other pending legal matters since the filing of the Motion for Summary Judgment which have detracted from the time available prepare a response. Specifically, Defendant's counsel has been required to prepare several appellate briefs and respond to numerous summary judgment motions that have been filed in various cases over the course of the past several weeks.
5. Defendant has requested and shall be granted an extension of time until January 25, 2019, in which to respond to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment.
6. Plaintiffs have requested and shall be granted an extension of time in which to file any Reply. Plaintiffs shall file any Reply brief within 21 days after Defendant's Response is filed.
7. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purpose of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
