Keith v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01110-JAD-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190118a90
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (Third Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from January 16, 2019 to January 17, 2019 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has chronic migraines, which impair her vision and had a migraine on
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (Third Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from January 16, 2019 to January 17, 2019 . This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has chronic migraines, which impair her vision and had a migraine on ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER
(Third Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from January 16, 2019 to January 17, 2019. This is Defendant's third request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has chronic migraines, which impair her vision and had a migraine on the date of the current filing deadline. While Counsel for Defendant diligently attempted to finish her response, Counsel could not complete it due to her migraine and impaired vision. Due to Counsel's unexpected health issue, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
