Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nelson v. Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., 2:18-cv-01973-RFB-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190118a99 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff Vernon Nelson and Defendant Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that (1) Plaintiff shall have up through and including January 30, 2019, in which to file his response to Defendant Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc.'s Motion to Compel
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC.'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Vernon Nelson and Defendant Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that (1) Plaintiff shall have up through and including January 30, 2019, in which to file his response to Defendant Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration [Dkt. 28] filed in this matter ("Motion to Compel"), and (2) Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc. shall have up through and including February 13, 2019, in which to file its reply in support of the Motion to Compel.

This is the first request for an extension of time of the briefing schedule in relation to the Motion to Compel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer