Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Menos ex rel. Eco Science Solutions, Inc. v. Taylor, 3:17-CV-00662-LRH-VPC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190122813 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT (First Request) STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CARLA BALDWIN CARRY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendants Jeffery L. Taylor, Don L. Taylor, L. John Lewis, S. Randall Oveson and Gannon Giguiere (collectively, "Defendants") and Nominal Defendant Eco Science Solutio
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

(First Request)

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS AND NOMINAL DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendants Jeffery L. Taylor, Don L. Taylor, L. John Lewis, S. Randall Oveson and Gannon Giguiere (collectively, "Defendants") and Nominal Defendant Eco Science Solutions, Inc. ("Nominal Defendant"), by and through their counsel, the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, and Plaintiff Hans Menos, by and through his counsel the law firms of Leverty & Associates Law Chtd. Ltd. and The Rosen Law Firm, P.A., hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for the Defendants and the Nominal Defendant to respond to the Amended Complaint [Dkt 49] in this action by approximately seven (7) days, through and including Monday, February 11, 2019, and request that the Court enter an order approving the same.

Counsel for Defendants and Nominal Defendant have requested additional time to coordinate their responses in other matters arising out of the same facts and circumstances pending in multiple, different jurisdictions; and to prepare a response and defense that best promotes convenience, economy and consistency and avoids prejudice to any defendant; and Plaintiffs' counsel have agreed to the extension as a professional courtesy.

This is the first stipulation for an extension of time for any of the Defendants or the Nominal Defendant to respond to the Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer