Berry v. Desert Palace, Inc., 2:17-cv-00019-GMN-PAL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190125e00
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 99] (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Caesars"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to
Summary: STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 99] (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Caesars"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to C..
More
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 99]
(First Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs WILLIAM J. BERRY, JR., CYNTHIA FALLS, AND SHANE KAUFMANN ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant DESERT PALACE, INC., d/b/a CAESARS PALACE ("Caesars"), by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Caesars' motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 99] be extended for two weeks, from January 30, 2019 to and including February 14, 2019. Likewise, Caesars shall have an additional two weeks to file its reply brief up to and including March 14, 2019.
This extension was requested by Plaintiffs' counsel, who need additional time to prepare and file a thorough opposition to this dispositive motion (that contains 37 exhibits alone), which was filed on January 9, 2019 after the Court issued a decision denying the reopening of discovery. This brief extension will not unduly delay this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
