Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Parkin, 2:15-cr-00212-JCM-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190201625 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE COMPETENCY HEARING (First Request) NANCY KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Russ Marsh, Esq., counsel for defendant, that the competency hearing currently scheduled for January 28, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be vacated and continued until a time convenient to the Court but no sooner
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE COMPETENCY HEARING (First Request)

It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH, United States Attorney, and Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Russ Marsh, Esq., counsel for defendant, that the competency hearing currently scheduled for January 28, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be vacated and continued until a time convenient to the Court but no sooner than sixty (60) days.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The defendant filed a motion for a competency hearing on January 17, 2019, ECF No. 60, and the court set a hearing date for January 28, 2019, ECF No. 62. The report in support of defendant's motion was provided to counsel for the government on November 6, 2018. The government needs additional time to have the defendant evaluated by a government selected or court-appointed expert prior to the competency hearing.

2. The defendant does not oppose this request.

3. Subsequent to this stipulation, the parties plan to file a stipulation to continue calendar and trial which are currently set for February 6, 2019 and February 11, 2019.

4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow counsels sufficient time to prepare for the competency hearing.

5. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

6. The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial must start under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161 et. seq., considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(1)(A), 3161(h)(1)(D), 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

7. This is the first request for a continuance.

ORDER

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for the competency hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the competency hearing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for January 28, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to April 2, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 3B.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer