PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner"), respectfully moves for a 30 day extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and file the Certified Administrative Record (CAR). The current due date was January 28, 2019.
Good cause exists to extend the current deadline because Defendant needs additional time to prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff. (Declaration of Tina Naicker (Naicker Decl.) at ¶ 2). Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because Plaintiff is pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and serve to Plaintiff (Naicker Decl. at ¶ 3). Counsel attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29, 2019, but could not reach Plaintiff as the call failed, despite repeated attempts to reach her (Id. at ¶ 4). To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of the CAR to Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Id. at ¶ 5). Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant respectfully requests that the Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
I, Tina L. Naicker, declare, as follows:
1. I am an Assistant Regional Counsel for the Office of the General Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration. I am Special Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the Northern District of California, and am the primary attorney handling the defense of this matter. I make this Declaration on personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances herein and if called to testify could and would do so competently.
2. On August 21, 2018, Plaintiff filed her complaint (Dkt. 7). Defendant was served on November 27, 2018. As such, the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and file Decl. of TLN ISO Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and CAR; Case No. 2:18-cv-00987-GMN-PAL and serve a copy of the Certified Administrative Record (CAR) was on January 28, 2019. Due to a calendaring and/or technical error, I did not accurately calendar Defendant's response time and upon learning the error, I immediately sought an extension of time. Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time to prepare a paper copy of the CAR and serve Plaintiff.
3. Under current agency guidelines, instead of the electronic copy of the CAR, because Plaintiff is pro see in this matter, the agency is required to prepare a separate paper copy to file and serve to Plaintiff. As such, additional time is required in order to prepare a paper copy of the CAR to serve Plaintiff.
4. I attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone on January 29, 2019, but each attempt resulted in "Call Failed" and I was not able to reach her by the telephone number listed on the docket. I have no reason to believe that Plaintiff would object to the requested relief and will suffer no prejudice as a result of the request for extension.
5. To the extent the Motion is not granted, Defendant will not be able to provide a copy of the paper CAR to Plaintiff in order for her to prepare her Motion for Summary Judgment.
6. The current due date for Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's complaint was January 28, 2019. The new due date for Defendant to file her response and CAR would be
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the above statements are true and correct.
For good cause appearing therein, IT