Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Garrott, 2:18-cr-00252-JCM-VCF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190206e25 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2019
Summary: Stipulation to Continue Hearing (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Robert Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Mace Yampolsky, counsel for defendant Nicholas Garrott, that the suppression hearing currently set for February 11, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be continued to a date convenient for the Court but no sooner than seven days fro
More

Stipulation to Continue Hearing (First Request)

It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Robert Knief, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Mace Yampolsky, counsel for defendant Nicholas Garrott, that the suppression hearing currently set for February 11, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be continued to a date convenient for the Court but no sooner than seven days from the currently scheduled date.

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Government counsel is scheduled to be out of the state for training purposes. Confirmation of the training was received the date of this stipulation and was delayed due to the partial government shut down.

2. Defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the government deadline.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This request does not extend the trial date and no waiver or extension of speedy trial is necessary.

6. This is the first request for a continuance filed herein.

Order Stipulation to Continue Hearing (First Request)

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Government counsel is scheduled to be out of the state for training purposes. Confirmation of the training was received the date of this stipulation and was delayed due to the partial government shut down.

2. The Defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance.

3. For the reasons stated above, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the government deadlines.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and prepare a response, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

It is therefore ORDERED that the suppression hearing currently set for February 11, 2019 at 1:00 p.m., be continued to the 22nd day of February, 2019. at 1:00 PM, in Courtroom 3D.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer