Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steinmetz v. American Honda Finance, 2:19-CV-00064-GMN-VCF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190206e33 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Eric Steinmetz ("Steinmetz") and Defendant Department Stores National Bank, erroneously named herein as Macys/DSNB, ("DSNB"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and move for entry of an order extending DSNB's deadline to respond to the Complaint by 14 days, up to and including February 18, 2019. In the event that a Rule 26(f) conferenc
More

STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff Eric Steinmetz ("Steinmetz") and Defendant Department Stores National Bank, erroneously named herein as Macys/DSNB, ("DSNB"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby jointly stipulate and move for entry of an order extending DSNB's deadline to respond to the Complaint by 14 days, up to and including February 18, 2019. In the event that a Rule 26(f) conference is scheduled prior to February 18, 2019, DSNB agrees that it will participate in the same.

A proposed Order is submitted concurrently with this Stipulated Motion that DSNB may have up to and including February 18, 2019 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer