Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eliason v. Clark County, 2:17-cv-03017-JAD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190207d36 Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff ROBERT ELIASON, Defendant CLARK COUNTY and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS & TRAINING (collectively, "the Parties"), hereby stipulate to a 14-day extension of time for the Parties to file their responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54 and ECF No. 58]. Currently, the response deadline
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSES TO DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

(First Request)

Plaintiff ROBERT ELIASON, Defendant CLARK COUNTY and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS & TRAINING (collectively, "the Parties"), hereby stipulate to a 14-day extension of time for the Parties to file their responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54 and ECF No. 58]. Currently, the response deadlines are February 7, 2019. The Parties would like until February 21, 2019 to file their responses. This is the Parties' first request for an extension to file their responses.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Parties that the deadline for filing responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54 and ECF No. 58] shall be February 21, 2019.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for the Parties to file responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54 and ECF No. 58] shall be February 21, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer