Order [Docket No. 19].

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to revive the initial expert deadline and extend other subsequent deadlines. Docket No. 19. The stipulation raises several questions. First, the initial expert deadline expired on January 18, 2019. Requests to revive expired deadlines must be based on a showing of excusable neglect, Local Rule 26-4; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B), and such a showing is not made in the stipulation.1 Second, one of the reasons for the extension is that Defendants are awaiting disclosure of the documents upon which Plaintiff's initial experts relied. See Docket No. 19 at 3. It is not clear why those exhibits were not already produced. Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)(iii) (expert disclosures must include the exhibits that support the expert's opinions). Third, the parties seek a 120-day extension,2 which would nearly reset the entire discovery clock. See Local Rule 26-1(b)(1) (establishing presumptively reasonable discovery period at 180 days); see also Docket No. 13 (adopting the parties' proposal for a 180-day discovery period in this case). An insufficient showing has been made that such a lengthy extension is warranted here.

The Court hereby SETS the stipulation for a telephonic hearing for 11:00 a.m. on February 12, 2019.3 Counsel shall appear telephonically by calling the Court conference line at 877-402-9757 at least five minutes prior to the hearing. The conference code is 6791056. In order to ensure a clear recording of the hearing, the call must be made using a land line phone. Cell phone calls, as well as the use of a speaker phone, are prohibited.

IT IS SO ORDERED.