Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Castro v. Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company, Case 2:18-cv-01514-JAD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190212b82 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON [25] DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [24] PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 27 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Berenice Castro, by and through her counsel of record, DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ., of the LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON, LLC., and Defendant ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ("Acuity Insurance"), by and through its counsel of record, CHAD C. BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP., hereby stipula
More

ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON [25] DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [24] PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT

ECF No. 27

Plaintiff Berenice Castro, by and through her counsel of record, DAVID F. SAMPSON, ESQ., of the LAW OFFICE OF DAVID SAMPSON, LLC., and Defendant ACUITY, A MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ("Acuity Insurance"), by and through its counsel of record, CHAD C. BUTTERFIELD, ESQ., of the law firm WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP., hereby stipulate and agree to continue the March 4, 2019 hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, to March 18, 2019 at 3:30 p.m. in Las Vegas, Courtroom 6D, before the Honorable Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey, subject to the Court's availability. Mr. Sampson has a firm trial setting on March 4, 2018 and will not be able to appear for the hearing as scheduled. The parties agree that the requested continuance is not being requested in bad faith or to delay these proceedings unnecessarily.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer