Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Allegiant Air, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, 2:18-cv-01360-NJK. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190213c61 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIMANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Allegiant Air, LLC ("Allegiant"), by and through its counsel of record, Jackson Lewis P.C. and Jones Day, and Defendants/Counterclaimants International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division ("IBT") and Airline Professionals Association, Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 ("Local 1224"), by and through their co
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIMANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

Plaintiff Allegiant Air, LLC ("Allegiant"), by and through its counsel of record, Jackson Lewis P.C. and Jones Day, and Defendants/Counterclaimants International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division ("IBT") and Airline Professionals Association, Teamsters Local Union No. 1224 ("Local 1224"), by and through their counsel of record, The Urban Law Firm and Law Office of Edward Gleason, PLLC, hereby stipulate to extend the time for Defendants/Counterclaimants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim to February 19, 2019.

Defendants/Counterclaimants' Answer and Counterclaim Against Plaintiff was filed on December 18, 2018. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff responded to the Counterclaim on January 22, 2019 after a stipulated two week extension of time was entered by the Court.

Due to illness of Defendants/Counterclaimants' lead counsel, travel schedules of potential witnesses, and travel of counsel. Defendants/Counterclaimants require a two-week extension of time— until February 19, 2019—to prepare their response to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Defendants/Counterclaimants have conferred with Plaintiff and Plaintiff has stated that it does not oppose the extension request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer