Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nevada Agency and Transfer Company v. Weyland Tech, Inc., 3:18-cv-00492-MMD-CBC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190213c85 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF Nos. 26 & 27) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . NEVADA AGENCY AND TRANSFER COMPANY, WEYLAND TECH, INC. and RAMASAMY RAVINDRAN, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the deadline for Nevada Agency and Transfer Company and Weyland Tech, Inc., to file responses to Ramasamy Ravindran's Motion to (I) Dismiss Nevada Agency and Transfer Company's Complaint For Interpleader, OR (II) Defer to the Litigation Pend
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF Nos. 26 & 27)

NEVADA AGENCY AND TRANSFER COMPANY, WEYLAND TECH, INC. and RAMASAMY RAVINDRAN, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the deadline for Nevada Agency and Transfer Company and Weyland Tech, Inc., to file responses to Ramasamy Ravindran's Motion to (I) Dismiss Nevada Agency and Transfer Company's Complaint For Interpleader, OR (II) Defer to the Litigation Pending in the High Court of Singapore (ECF No. 26) and Ramasamy Ravindran's Motion to (I) Dismiss Weyland Tech, Inc.'S Cross-Complaint; OR (II) Defer to the Litigation Pending in the High Court of Singapore (ECF No. 27) filed on Friday, January 25, 2019.

Nevada Agency and Transfer Company shall have until Monday, February 25, 2019, to file its response to Ramasay Ravindran's Motion to Dismiss Nevada Agency and Transfer Company's Complaint for Interpleader or Defer to the Litigation Pending in the High Court of Singapore (ECF No. 26).

Weyland Tech Inc. shall have until Monday, February 25, 2019, to file its response to Ramasay's Ravindran's Motion to Dismiss Weyland Tech Inc.'s Cross-Complaint or Defer to the Litigation Pending the High Court of Singapore (ECF. No. 27).

Ramasay Ravindran shall have until March 11, 2019 to file reply briefs in support of his pending motions. (ECF 26 & 27).

This is the first requested extension of these deadlines by stipulation. The parties request these extensions as Weyland Tech's counsel is out of the country for at least two (2) weeks and to ensure sufficient time to fully brief the issues for the Court.

IT IS SO STIUPULATED

ORDER GRANTING STIPLATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPONDE TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 26 & 27)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer