Smith v. U.S. Bank, National Association, 2-19-CV-00062-MMD-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190214f40
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . U.S. Bank Trust, National Association ("U.S. Bank") and Plaintiff Everett Smith stipulation and agree that U.S. Bank has up to and including February 28, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff Complaint (ECF No. 1), in order to provide the parties additional time to discuss settlement and to avoid unnecessary litigation expenses. 1 This is the second request for an extension, and it is
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . U.S. Bank Trust, National Association ("U.S. Bank") and Plaintiff Everett Smith stipulation and agree that U.S. Bank has up to and including February 28, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff Complaint (ECF No. 1), in order to provide the parties additional time to discuss settlement and to avoid unnecessary litigation expenses. 1 This is the second request for an extension, and it is ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
U.S. Bank Trust, National Association ("U.S. Bank") and Plaintiff Everett Smith stipulation and agree that U.S. Bank has up to and including February 28, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff Complaint (ECF No. 1), in order to provide the parties additional time to discuss settlement and to avoid unnecessary litigation expenses.1
This is the second request for an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. By filing this Stipulation, U.S. Bank is not waiving any defense, affirmative or otherwise, it may have in this matter.
Source: Leagle
