Lozano v. LeGrand, 3:12-cv-00574-MMD-CBC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190215c16
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This is a habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Before the Court is Petitioner Pasqual Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw. (ECF No. 58.) For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw will be granted. It is therefore ordered that Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw (ECF No. 58) is granted, and Ms. Wilson is terminated as counsel of record for Lozano. The Clerk of Court is instructed to forward a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator to secure
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This is a habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Before the Court is Petitioner Pasqual Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw. (ECF No. 58.) For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw will be granted. It is therefore ordered that Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw (ECF No. 58) is granted, and Ms. Wilson is terminated as counsel of record for Lozano. The Clerk of Court is instructed to forward a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator to secure ..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
This is a habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court is Petitioner Pasqual Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw. (ECF No. 58.)
For good cause shown, the motion to withdraw will be granted.
It is therefore ordered that Lozano's counsel's motion to withdraw (ECF No. 58) is granted, and Ms. Wilson is terminated as counsel of record for Lozano.
The Clerk of Court is instructed to forward a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator to secure a replacement panel attorney to represent Lozano. When replacement counsel is secured, the coordinator will forward counsel's name and contact information to staff attorneys Messrs. Baker and King to draft a formal appointment order with scheduling provisions tailored to the case.
The Clerk is further instructed to send a hard copy of this order to Mr. Lozano in proper person at his institutional address and reflect that additional transmittal either in the notice of electronic filing and/or the docket entry for this order.
Source: Leagle
