Kibbee v. Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., 2:18-cv-01848-APG-GWF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190220c77
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY (ECF No. 24) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Jason Kibbee ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., d/b/a Las Vegas Athletic Clubs ("Defendant") stipulate and agree that Defendant has up to and including February 27, 2019 to file its Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative,
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY (ECF No. 24) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Jason Kibbee ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., d/b/a Las Vegas Athletic Clubs ("Defendant") stipulate and agree that Defendant has up to and including February 27, 2019 to file its Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, t..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY (ECF No. 24)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jason Kibbee ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Smith-Palluck Associates Corp., d/b/a Las Vegas Athletic Clubs ("Defendant") stipulate and agree that Defendant has up to and including February 27, 2019 to file its Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, to Stay (ECF No. 24).
This request is made in good faith due to the schedule and other commitments of Defendant's counsel, and is not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
