Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jones v. Shac, LLC, 2:15-cv01382-RFB-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190220c89 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO OPPOSE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, including Corissa Jones and all Plaintiffs who opted into the instant action ("Class Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel of record, the law firm of Kennedy Hodges LLP, and Defendants/Counter-claimants SHAC, LLC, SHAC, MT, LLC, David Michael Talla and Peter Feinstein ("SHA
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE TO OPPOSE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, including Corissa Jones and all Plaintiffs who opted into the instant action ("Class Plaintiffs"), by and through their counsel of record, the law firm of Kennedy Hodges LLP, and Defendants/Counter-claimants SHAC, LLC, SHAC, MT, LLC, David Michael Talla and Peter Feinstein ("SHAC"), by and through their counsel of record, the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, as follows:

1. On February 4, 2019, Plaintiffs filed three voluminous partial motions for summary judgment, Docs. 189, 190 and 191; 2. The deadline for Defendants to respond is February 25, 2019; 3. However, Defendants requested, and Plaintiffs agreed to a brief extension of time; 4. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that Defendants will file oppositions to the pending partial motions for summary judgment by March 7, 2019 and Plaintiffs shall have up to March 21, 2019 to file their replies.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer