Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPONSE TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1]. FIRST REQUEST NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs DIAMOND RESORTS CORPORATION, DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC, and DIAMOND RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, KYLE BROWN, MARTIN BROWN, EXCHANGE POINTS CLUB, LLC, PREMIER REWARDS LLC, VMG RESORTS LLC, VACATION MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, and OWNER EXTRAS, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their re
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPONSE TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1]. FIRST REQUEST NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs DIAMOND RESORTS CORPORATION, DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC, and DIAMOND RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, KYLE BROWN, MARTIN BROWN, EXCHANGE POINTS CLUB, LLC, PREMIER REWARDS LLC, VMG RESORTS LLC, VACATION MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, and OWNER EXTRAS, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their res..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPONSE TO COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1].
FIRST REQUEST
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs DIAMOND RESORTS CORPORATION, DIAMOND RESORTS HOLDINGS, LLC, and DIAMOND RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants, KYLE BROWN, MARTIN BROWN, EXCHANGE POINTS CLUB, LLC, PREMIER REWARDS LLC, VMG RESORTS LLC, VACATION MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, and OWNER EXTRAS, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION
1. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on February 6, 2019 [ECF No. 1] alleging causes of action for violations of the Lanham Act, among other claims.
2. Some of the Defendants were served on February 7, 2019, and the remaining Defendants were served thereafter.
3. The current deadline for the Defendants to respond to the Complaint is February 28, 2019.
4. Defendants initially retained a law firm in Las Vegas to represent them in this matter. However, that law firm subsequently advised Defendants that it had a conflict and could not represent Defendants in this case.
5. In the afternoon of February 18, 2019, Defendants were able to regain Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to represent them in this lawsuit.
6. However, due to the short time period, Defendants' attorneys have not had a chance to obtain documents or discuss in detail with the Defendants the allegations of the Complaint.
7. Defendants request an extension to allow them to fully review and respond to the allegations in the Complaint.
8. Defendants request an extension until March 21, 2019 to file their response to the Complaint.
9. The parties have conferred and have agreed to the requested extension and schedule described above.
10. The parties also agree that the Defendants are not waiving their right to seek additional time by means of a motion to this Court should they feel it is necessary.
11. This stipulation is not made for purposes of delay.
12. Therefore, the parties agree that Defendants' response to the Complaint is now due on or before March 21, 2019.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
