Rodriguez v. Naphcare, 2:17-cv-02344-RFB-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190311b32
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is plaintiff Michael Rodriguez's Motion to Extend Time to Reply to the Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 111), field on February 27, 2019. Rodriguez requests a one-week extension of the reply deadline, making the reply due March 11, 2019. Having read and considered the motion, and good cause appearing under Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion is granted. I
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is plaintiff Michael Rodriguez's Motion to Extend Time to Reply to the Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 111), field on February 27, 2019. Rodriguez requests a one-week extension of the reply deadline, making the reply due March 11, 2019. Having read and considered the motion, and good cause appearing under Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion is granted. IT..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Michael Rodriguez's Motion to Extend Time to Reply to the Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (ECF No. 111), field on February 27, 2019. Rodriguez requests a one-week extension of the reply deadline, making the reply due March 11, 2019. Having read and considered the motion, and good cause appearing under Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the motion is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
