Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Platunov v. Nye County, 2:18-cv-00917-GMN-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190312b79
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 12, 2019 PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the parties, by and through their undersigned Attorneys of Record, and hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order to Continue Motion Hearing currently set for March 12, 2019, due to a scheduling conflict for undersigned counsel for Defendants, who will be out of the state on the scheduled date. This hearing involves the parties' Joint Motion for
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 12, 2019

COMES NOW, the parties, by and through their undersigned Attorneys of Record, and hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order to Continue Motion Hearing currently set for March 12, 2019, due to a scheduling conflict for undersigned counsel for Defendants, who will be out of the state on the scheduled date. This hearing involves the parties' Joint Motion for Extension of Discovery and Related Deadlines (#23) (first request) filed February 13, 2019, which was initially set for a hearing on March 4, 2019, via this Court's Minute Order (#24) issued February 20, 2019.

Because counsel for Plaintiffs was unable to attend that date due to a host of required appearances in the Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County, undersigned defense counsel agreed to a continuance and a stipulation with new requested dates was submitted. While the Court granted the stipulation on February 28, 2019, the Order (#26) set the hearing for a date not included in the stipulation. Unfortunately, undersigned counsel for Defendants will be out of the office with family for a long-planned vacation that next week, and therefore has requested that Plaintiffs' counsel stipulate, and begs the Court's indulgence to consider, another short continuance of the upcoming hearing.1 The parties represent that Plaintiffs' counsel Thomas J. Gibson, Esq., and Defendant's counsel Brent L. Ryman, Esq., have available dates as follows:

Tuesday, March 26, 2019 (beginning at 2 p.m.) Wednesday, March 27, 2019 Thursday, March 28, 2019

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court upon the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing scheduled for the 12th day of March 2019 be continued to the 26th day of March, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard.

FootNotes


1. This stipulation would have been submitted immediately after the issuance of the Court's Order (#26) but for the undersigned's mistake in believing the new hearing was set for Tuesday, March 5, 2019, which all counsel discussed at Plaintiff's deposition shortly after receiving the CMECF notification. It was only the morning of March 5, 2019, as counsel prepared to exit the office to catch a plane for what he believed would be the hearing, that the mistake was noticed and the request to reschedule issued to Plaintiff's counsel and the Courtroom Clerk.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer