Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY DEADLINE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 98] (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Ditech Financial Services LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC ( Ditech ) and Federal National Mortgage Association ( FNMA ) (collectively Plaintiffs ) and Airmotive Investments, LLC ( Airmotive ) stipulate to extend plaintiffs deadline to file its reply supporting its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 98, for an additional 14 days or
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY DEADLINE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 98] (SECOND REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Ditech Financial Services LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC ( Ditech ) and Federal National Mortgage Association ( FNMA ) (collectively Plaintiffs ) and Airmotive Investments, LLC ( Airmotive ) stipulate to extend plaintiffs deadline to file its reply supporting its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 98, for an additional 14 days or ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY DEADLINE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[ECF NOS. 98]
(SECOND REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Ditech Financial Services LLC f/k/a Green Tree Servicing LLC (Ditech) and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) (collectively Plaintiffs) and Airmotive Investments, LLC (Airmotive) stipulate to extend plaintiffs deadline to file its reply supporting its motion for summary judgment, ECF Nos. 98, for an additional 14 days or until March 22, 2019.
Plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on November 16, 2018. (ECF Nos. 98). Airmotive responded to Plaintiffs motion on February 5, 2019. (ECF Nos. 105) Pursuant to the stipulation and order entered on January 9, 2019, Plaintiff's reply is due 30 days from the date Defendants' responses are filed, or March 7, 2019. (ECF No. 103)
The parties stipulate to extending plaintiffs reply deadline by fourteen days, from March 7, 2019 to March 21, 2019, to allow additional time to prepare their briefing.
This is the Plaintiffs' second request to extend their summary judgment briefing deadline in this case. The parties do not make this request to cause delay or prejudice any party.
NO FURTHER EXTENSION WILL BE GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
