STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY THE BRIEFING SCHEDULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES RELATED TO DEFENDANTS' EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF NO. 87)

CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Kory Razaghi, through his attorney of record, Marquis Aurbach Coffing; and Defendants, Ahmad Razaghi, Razaghi Healthcare, LLC (NV), Razaghi Healthcare, LLC (AZ), and Razaghi Development Company, LLC, through their attorneys of record, Rothstein Donatelli (Pro Hac Vice) and Bailey Kennedy that the briefing schedule currently set for Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees Related to Defendants' Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 87) is stayed until the Court issues a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend or Reconsider Magistrate Judge's Protective Order (ECF No. 83) and Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order ECF No. 81 (ECF No. 86). Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees Related to Defendants' Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 87) was filed on March 8, 2019 and the deadline for Plaintiff to file his response to this motion is currently set for Friday, March 22, 2019. The parties have agreed to this extension stay to ensure that time and resources are not wasted submitting responses and replies to Defendants' motion considering Defendants will likely supplement their Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 37) if Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend or Reconsider Magistrate Judge's Protective Order (ECF No. 83) and Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order ECF No. 81 (ECF No. 86) are rejected by the Court; and from the Plaintiff's perspective, a response to Defendants' Motion for Attorneys Fees (ECF No. 87) may not be necessary if the Court reverses the Magistrate's order granting Defendants' Emergency Motion for Protective Order.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the parties that Defendants shall have 14 days after the Court issues a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend or Reconsider Magistrate Judge's Protective Order (ECF No. 83) and Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order ECF No. 81 (ECF No. 86) to supplement their motion for fees, if appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by the parties that Plaintiff shall have 14 days after the Court issues a ruling on Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend or Reconsider Magistrate Judge's Protective Order (ECF No. 83) and Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order ECF No. 81 (ECF No. 86) to provide a response to Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 87), if appropriate. However, if Defendants file a supplement to their Motion for Attorney Fees, Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date that the supplement is filed to provide a response to Defendants' Motion for Fees and its supplement. Defendants' reply will be due seven days after Plaintiff submits his response.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.