Antonetti v. Filson, 3:17-cv-00621-MMD-CBC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190319d54
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Petitioner Joseph Antonetti is before the Court on motions for extension of time from both parties. The Court finds that good cause exists to grant both parties' motions. It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion to extend time to file an amended petition (ECF No. 18) is granted nunc pro tunc. It is further ordered that Respondents' four motions to extend time to file a responsive
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Petitioner Joseph Antonetti is before the Court on motions for extension of time from both parties. The Court finds that good cause exists to grant both parties' motions. It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion to extend time to file an amended petition (ECF No. 18) is granted nunc pro tunc. It is further ordered that Respondents' four motions to extend time to file a responsive ..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus by Petitioner Joseph Antonetti is before the Court on motions for extension of time from both parties. The Court finds that good cause exists to grant both parties' motions.
It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion to extend time to file an amended petition (ECF No. 18) is granted nunc pro tunc.
It is further ordered that Respondents' four motions to extend time to file a responsive pleading (ECF Nos. 21, 22, 23, 24) are all granted nunc pro tunc.
Source: Leagle
