STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Hill ("Plaintiff"), by and through his undersigned counsel of record, the law firm of Bowen Law Offices, and Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record, the law firm of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P., hereby stipulate and request an order from the Court to extend the filing deadline for Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed on March 8, 2019 (ECF No. 57) and Defendants' reply in support of the same Motion. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time regarding Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss.

Currently, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss is due no later than March 22, 2019 (ECF No. 57). Plaintiff and Defendants request a seven (7) day extension of time, up to and including, March 29, 2019, for Plaintiff to file his opposition. Plaintiff requires additional time to complete his research to support his opposition.

If the extension is granted, Defendants' reply in support of their Partial Motion to Dismiss will be due April 12, 2019. Plaintiff and Defendants also request a seven (7) day extension of time, up to and including, April 19, 2019, for Defendants to file their reply. Defendants also anticipate needing additional time to complete research and client review of the reply.

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants that Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 29, 2019, to file his opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss and Defendants shall have up to and including April 19, 2019, to file their reply in support of Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 57).