ORDER

MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.

Petitioner in this capital habeas corpus action, Kevin James Lisle, filed a document pro se on January 7, 2019 (ECF No. 321) and another on February 19, 2019 (ECF No. 327). Those documents have been filed under seal. On March 6, 2019, Respondents filed a motion (ECF No. 334) requesting that Lisle's two pro se filings be unsealed. Lisle was to file his response to Respondents' motion by March 20, 2019. (See Order entered March 7, 2019 (ECF No. 338); LR 7-2(b).)

On March 20, 2019, Lisle filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 339), requesting a 21-day extension of time to April 10, 2019, to respond to the motion to unseal documents. Lisle's counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of his other responsibilities. Respondents responded to the motion for extension of time on March 26, 2019 (ECF No. 340) indicating that they do not oppose the extension of time requested by Lisle, but requesting that, if it is granted, they be granted at least 21 days to file their reply in support of the motion to unseal documents. Lisle filed a reply in support of his motion for extension of time on March 26, 2019 (ECF No. 341).

The Court finds that both Lisle's and Respondents' requests for extensions of time are made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the extensions.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 339) is granted. Petitioner will have until April 10, 2019, to respond to the motion to unseal documents (ECF No. 334). Respondents will then have 30 days to file a reply in support of their motion.