Urenda-Bustos v. Williams, 2:16-CV-2165 JCM (NJK). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190402f00
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MOHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of Urenda-Bustos v. Williams et al, case no. 2:16-cv-02165-JCM-NJK. Plaintiff Luis Urenda-Bustos ("plaintiff") has filed two motions for reconsideration asking that the court reconsider its order closing this case for lack of personal service. (ECF Nos. 35, 37). The court has already denied plaintiff's first motion for reconsideration requesting similar relief. See (ECF No. 39). Further, motions for recon
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MOHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is the matter of Urenda-Bustos v. Williams et al, case no. 2:16-cv-02165-JCM-NJK. Plaintiff Luis Urenda-Bustos ("plaintiff") has filed two motions for reconsideration asking that the court reconsider its order closing this case for lack of personal service. (ECF Nos. 35, 37). The court has already denied plaintiff's first motion for reconsideration requesting similar relief. See (ECF No. 39). Further, motions for recons..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MOHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the matter of Urenda-Bustos v. Williams et al, case no. 2:16-cv-02165-JCM-NJK.
Plaintiff Luis Urenda-Bustos ("plaintiff") has filed two motions for reconsideration asking that the court reconsider its order closing this case for lack of personal service. (ECF Nos. 35, 37). The court has already denied plaintiff's first motion for reconsideration requesting similar relief. See (ECF No. 39).
Further, motions for reconsideration are disfavored and plaintiff fails to address the applicable standard for reconsideration. See Local Rule 59-1; see also ESCO Corp. v. Cashman Equip. Co., 158 F.Supp.3d 1051, 1076 (D. Nev. 2016). Therefore, the court will deny plaintiff's motions.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's motions for reconsideration (ECF Nos. 35, 37) be, and the same hereby are, DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
