Barr-Thomas v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-02251-APG-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190405f38
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2019
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests for the first time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on April 8, 2019, by 30 days, through and including May 8, 2019. Defense counsel needs an extension of time because she is a newer hire who needs more time t
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests for the first time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on April 8, 2019, by 30 days, through and including May 8, 2019. Defense counsel needs an extension of time because she is a newer hire who needs more time to..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests for the first time that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, due on April 8, 2019, by 30 days, through and including May 8, 2019.
Defense counsel needs an extension of time because she is a newer hire who needs more time to draft the response and go through the necessary in-house reviews and her reviewer, due to his own heavy workload demands, needs more time to review counsel's brief. Defense counsel needs more time to determine whether options exist for settlement and to accommodate competing workload demands. This request is made in good faith with no intention to delay unduly the proceedings. Counsel apologizes to the Court and Plaintiff for any inconvenience this delay may cause.
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff's counsel on April 2, 2019, Plaintiff's counsel does not oppose this motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
