Sainvil v. Printy, 2:18-cv-01121-APG-CWH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190405f40
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2019
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case [ECF No. 20] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On March 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Junior Sainvil has failed to comply with court orders. ECF No. 20. Sainvil did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portio
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case [ECF No. 20] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On March 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Junior Sainvil has failed to comply with court orders. ECF No. 20. Sainvil did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portion..
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case [ECF No. 20]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
On March 8, 2019, Magistrate Judge Hoffman recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Junior Sainvil has failed to comply with court orders. ECF No. 20. Sainvil did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).
Additionally, Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation was returned in the mail. ECF No. 11. Under Local Rule IA 3-1, a pro se party must immediately advise the court of any change of address. "Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court." LR IA 3-1.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation (ECF No. 20) is accepted. Plaintiff Junior Sainvil's complaint is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
