Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Castillo v. Bisbee, 3:17-cv-00617-MMD-CBC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190410a25 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff ISMEAL CASTILLO, appearing in proper person, and Defendants CONNIE BISBEE; LUCILLE MONTERDE; MICHAEL KEELER; SUSAN JACKSON; BRIAN STONE, by and through counsel, AARON D FORD, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and KATHLEEN BRADY, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by order o
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff ISMEAL CASTILLO, appearing in proper person, and Defendants CONNIE BISBEE; LUCILLE MONTERDE; MICHAEL KEELER; SUSAN JACKSON; BRIAN STONE, by and through counsel, AARON D FORD, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and KATHLEEN BRADY, Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court, with each party to bear his or her own attorneys' fees and costs.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. The Court has examined the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice as agreed by the parties herein, good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action be dismissed without prejudice, with each party bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer