Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cabrera v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, 2:19-cv-00374-MMD-CWH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190412a89 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CHASE BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN REQUEST CARL W. HOFFMAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Oscar S. Cabrera (hereafter "Plaintiff") through his attorney David H. Krieger, Esq., and Lindsey H. Morales, Esq. attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (hereafter "Chase") that Defendant Chase may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to P
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND CHASE BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN REQUEST

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Oscar S. Cabrera (hereafter "Plaintiff") through his attorney David H. Krieger, Esq., and Lindsey H. Morales, Esq. attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (hereafter "Chase") that Defendant Chase may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Specifically, the parties have agreed to extend Defendant's time to respond. Defendant may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 9, 2019.

The parties further agree that good cause exists for this extension. The amended response deadline allows Defendant to continue investigating the matter and for the parties to continue their productive discussions regarding the dispute.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before May 9, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer