Filed: Apr. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT CITY OF HENDERSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR CITY OF HENDERSON TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Plaintiff Jane Doe may have additional time within which to submit Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant City of Henderson's Motion to Dismi
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT CITY OF HENDERSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR CITY OF HENDERSON TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Plaintiff Jane Doe may have additional time within which to submit Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant City of Henderson's Motion to Dismis..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT CITY OF HENDERSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR CITY OF HENDERSON TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS
(First Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective attorneys that Plaintiff Jane Doe may have additional time within which to submit Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant City of Henderson's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #12) and that Defendant City of Henderson may have additional time within which to submit the City's Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss.
1. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-2, Plaintiff's Opposition would be due April 11, 2019 and the City of Henderson's Reply would be due seven days after service of the Opposition.
2. On April 4, 2019, Marta D. Kurshumova, counsel for Plaintiff, conferred with Brian R. Reeve, counsel for Defendant City of Henderson, regarding the timing of Plaintiff's Opposition and the City of Henderson's Reply. Counsel for the parties agreed that Plaintiff could have until Friday, April 19, 2019 to file her Opposition and that the City of Henderson could have 14 days from the service of the Opposition in which to file a Reply brief.
3. Good cause exists for this extension as Ms. Kurshumova will be out of the office for one (1) week for medical reasons and Mr. Reeve will be out of the office from April 16 through April 21.
4. The extension will not result in undue delay in the administration of this case.
5. No other enlargement of time has been previously requested in this case.
This document is being electronically filed through the Court's ECF System. In this regard, counsel for Plaintiff hereby attests that (1) the content of this document is acceptable to all persons required to sign the document; (2) Defendant's counsel has concurred with the filing of this document; and (3) a record supporting this concurrence is available for inspection or production if so ordered.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
That pursuant to the Stipulation agreed upon by both parties, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant City of Henderson's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to April 19, 2019. Defendant City of Henderson will have 14 days from the service of Plaintiff's Opposition within which to file a Reply brief.
