Kuloloia v. Ohio Security Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-00405-JCM-PAL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190419c35
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Keoni Paul Kuloloia ("Plaintiff") and Defendants' Ohio Security Insurance Company ("Ohio"), erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.; dba Liberty Mutual Insurance Company dba Liberty Mutual; Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company aka Liberty Mutual Insurance, by and through their respective counsel, that
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Keoni Paul Kuloloia ("Plaintiff") and Defendants' Ohio Security Insurance Company ("Ohio"), erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.; dba Liberty Mutual Insurance Company dba Liberty Mutual; Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company aka Liberty Mutual Insurance, by and through their respective counsel, that t..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Keoni Paul Kuloloia ("Plaintiff") and Defendants' Ohio Security Insurance Company ("Ohio"), erroneously sued as Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.; dba Liberty Mutual Insurance Company dba Liberty Mutual; Liberty Mutual Auto and Home Services, LLC; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company aka Liberty Mutual Insurance, by and through their respective counsel, that the above matter be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the stipulation to dismiss with prejudice applies to preclude any Motion for Reconsideration, Amended Complaint or any further or future pleading that might be filed in response to the Court's ruling on February 11, 2019 granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF. No. 25).
This case has not been scheduled for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Source: Leagle
