Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnson v. Hooter's, Inc., 2:18-cv-01381-RFB-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190424c02 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY AND CASE DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . COME NOW, Defendants HILV Fee LLC and NAV-115 E. Tropicana, LLC ("HILV Defendants"); erroneously named Hooters Casino Hotel, Hooters of America, LLC, Navegante Group, Inc., and Trinity Hotel Investors, LLC, by and through the law offices of Tyson & Mendes LLP; HOOTER'S INC, by and through the law offices of Elizabeth R. Mikesell; and Plaintiff STEVE JOHNSON, b
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY AND CASE DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS

COME NOW, Defendants HILV Fee LLC and NAV-115 E. Tropicana, LLC ("HILV Defendants"); erroneously named Hooters Casino Hotel, Hooters of America, LLC, Navegante Group, Inc., and Trinity Hotel Investors, LLC, by and through the law offices of Tyson & Mendes LLP; HOOTER'S INC, by and through the law offices of Elizabeth R. Mikesell; and Plaintiff STEVE JOHNSON, by and through the law offices of WILLIAMS LAW GROUP; and hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED that the parties jointly request an Order staying all discovery and case deadlines until the pending Motions to Dismiss are ruled upon.

The parties have good cause for requesting the stay due to the possible effect of resolving all claims or issues in this case if the pending Motions to Dismiss are granted [ECF 24 and 26]. HILV Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is based on the statute of limitations. Hooter's Inc's Motion to Dismiss is based on the statute of limitations as well as an assertion of lack of personal jurisdiction over Hooter's Inc.

The parties believe a stay of the matter is appropriate to conserve judicial resources as well as the resources of the parties.

The parties have entered into the agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED that once the stay is lifted, any remaining parties will submit a proposed amended discovery scheduling order within 30-days from the date the stay is lifted.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

THE WILLIAMS LAW GROUP TYSON & MENDES LLP /s/Andrew Williams /s/Christopher A. Lund Andrew Williams, Esq. THOMAS E. MCGRATH Email: Andrew@TheWilliamsLG.com Nevada Bar No. 7086 6273 Sunset Drive, Suite D3 CHRISTOPHER A. LUND South Miami, FL 33143 Nevada Bar No. 12435 Attorneys for Plaintiff Steven Johnson 3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Tel: (702) 724-2648 DATED this 17th day of April 2019. Attorneys for Defendants HILV Fee LLC, and NAV-115 E. Tropicana, llc LAW OFFICES OF ELIZABETH R. MIKESELL /s/Elizabeth R. Mikesell Elizabeth R. Mikesell, Esq. Marion V. Hamilton-Thevenet, Esq. Email: LasVegasLegal@LibertyMutual.com Marion V. Hamilton-Thevenet, Esq. 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd, Suite 250 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorneys for Defendant Hooter's, Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer